The Name Is a Symptom
what’s in a name?
For over a year I’ve been trying to find the name that can best reflecte my artistic identity as a true reflection of me, my art, and why I make it. I’ve worked under several different names over the years as I’ve grown, my work has evolved, and my life has changed. It has been said that you aren’t just selling your art but yourself, and I have wanted to make sure that the name on my art is as much a part of the art as the imagery, style and materials I use. It all needs to be working toward the same goal. I was looking for a name that would match my identity rather than looking for an identity I want to match it.
I’ve tried dozens. Some clever. Some ridiculous. Some that felt perfect…until they didn’t. During the process, I kept assuming I was searching for a better name and perhaps I was, but it was bigger than that. Turns out I was searching for a better understanding of myself and my motivations and the role I want to fill as a midwest folk trickster and what approach I will be taking as I begin making art that will reflect this new world that I occupy.
Discovery
As I continued to go in circles, wrapping myself a name, trying it on, sitting with it, and eventually growing more uncomfortable with it, I discovered something. Every name I liked six months ago reflected who I used to think I wanted to be. Not who I’m becoming. The trouble was, I wasn’t yet sure who that person was. I think I’m finally beginning to figure that out.
The Pattern
I was stuck believing I wanted people to think:
- funny
- irreverent
- lowbrow
- approachable
But when I looked at the words I’ve been using to describe my work lately, a different pattern appeared. Now I keep saying things like:
- grounded
- weathered
- industrial
- prairie
- agricultural
- handmade
- dry
- ironic without being sarcastic
- healthy skepticism
- Midwestern
What I thought was a branding exercise was really an exercise in defining my identity. A name to reflect my purpose.
previous iterations
Moe Profane
As I was hitting my middle 30s, my creative itch had been fermenting for years, building until it finally exploded into my first mature body of work. I had read about the Stuckist movement in the UK and their leader, Billy Childish. His art didn’t resonate with me, but the way his name reflected his motivations and purpose really stuck with me. The recovering Catholic side of me decided to make art under the name Moe Profane which would also match the persona I had already been cultivating in the Louisville, KY hipster/art/music scene. Moe Profane was my id. He said and painted things that I never would have.
Dick Van Der Wurst
It wasn’t long after that I began to grow more and more uncomfortable with the name. It seemed silly. I was older and less angry. I wanted to be lighter and less negative. I looked for a name that would embrace the Texas German heritage and reflect some of the pop culture and humor as well. An annual South Texas event, Wurstfest (sausage festival) inspired wonderful puns (wurst/worst), and “Dick” worked as a not-so-subtle nod toward my still somewhat irreverent iconoclastic worldview.
Mikey Likey
My move to Illinois got me thinking that I needed something a bit more grounded and less silly, but every bit as connected to my work. I gravitated toward the name and eventually embraced “Mikey Likey,” but I believe now that I was too eager to settle the matter and was settling because it was familiar. It is a phrase I have said enough times that my sister actually uses it as a playful nickname for me. It felt poppy and fun and positive. It seemed perfect for a while, but soon I was having doubts. I didn’t want a name that might eventually make me cringe when introducing myself.
It isn’t that I dislike the name. I dislike the assumptions it creates. It sounds playful. Not serious. Young and cute. Not strong and grounded. It isn’t subtle. Just too much of the wrong vibe. Meant to be ironic, it risked just being a silly joke no one got. I feared it might require me to project myself in an inauthentic way in order to meet the expectations it would put in people’s heads. That’s not what I really wanted or needed.
The better question
Eventually I stumbled upon a better question to ask while judging how well a name would work.
Instead of asking:
“Do I like this name?”
I started asking:
“What kind of man do I want people to imagine before they see the paintings?”
That question led me where I needed to go.
Then I heard a name…
As time passed I kept encountering names that would have me asking, “Oh, damn. Why didn’t I think of that before? I wish I had chosen something like that.” Then a name appeared that I thought was perfect. Woodcock. Strong, independent, authentic…I figured if I combined it with the right first name it could have just a hint of old school “TV detective” and “male porn star” in the same way I have wanted names in the past to have a kind of anti-establishment, punk rocker type of vibe. Real enough to not sound invented, but just perfect enough that someone might stop and think, “That name is so spot on, it almost sounds made up” rather than “Oh wow, he made up a funny name.”
I was feeling that it wasn’t so much…
“That’s funny.”
But instead more of…
“That sounds like a guy who has busted a few knuckles.”
New Perspective
I realized I was inadvertently trying to invent a persona when what I actually want is to discover my own…and label it. My art and I really have no need for a persona at all. The best artist name might not be the funniest. Or the cleverest.

When I checked Google to see if there other Otis Woodcocks out there that might give me reason to avoid that name, I found one. But rather than discouraging me, it reassure me. The moment I put this fact to that name, I knew I didn’t want to be ol’ Otis “Woody” Woodcock, but this shared name would embody an attitude my authentic self would be able to comfortably deliver.
It felt like a name that had existed long before I found it.





