Mashing Up Female Archetypes

I am in the middle of pondering how to mash up The Pinup and Virgin archetypes…in combination perhaps of different female tropes and stereotypes that exist. I’m thinking they can be in a tarot card format rather than a mexican loteria type style that may have been more appropriate for audiences in San Antonio. This list isn’t educational or informative for any audience for me as I mine it for inspiration. I am not meaning for anything at this stage to be a commentary on femininity, cultural norms or gender issues. Mashing them together will result in more of a mockery of all of them and the human need to find patterns and define categories and turning complexity and nuance into lazy shorthand.

And the pairings don’t have to be limited to just Pinup and virgin. The Rebel/Shrew, Sage/Witch, Trailblazer/Bitchy Boss, Creator/Vain Beauty, Hustler/Gold Digger, Explorer/Party Girl, Advocate/Shrill Feminist, Balancer/Nagging Wife or Sacrificial Mother can describe remarkably similar behavior depending upon who is doing the looking. There may actually be a stronger connection to Virgin/Pinup than simply adding those as two more archetypes. Virgin and Pinup can function almost like filters applied to the others: the Caregiver can become Madonna or MILF; the Rebel can become liberated woman or slut; the Trailblazer can become heroic pioneer or emasculating career woman; the Creator can become autonomous artist or beautiful object/brand.

In this group, the woman doesn’t necessarily have to change—the cultural reading of her does.

The pinup

The pin-up archetype is a mid-20th-century symbol of playful femininity, celebrated for its unique blend of glamorous allure and wholesome, everyday charm. Originating from pictures meant to be “pinned up” on walls, this archetype became a cultural phenomenon during World War II, boosting morale and defining a new standard of confident womanhood. Rather than presenting a passive or aggressive image, the pin-up relies on charismatic, expressive storytelling and a cheerful, inviting presence.

Core Qualities

  • Playful Confidence: Exudes a bright, enthusiastic energy, often capturing a sense of mischievous fun or surprise.
  • Approachable Glamour: Blends high-fashion elements like bold red lips and manicured waves with a friendly, girl-next-door persona.
  • Suggested Allure: Relies on teasing, tongue-in-cheek scenarios—such as a caught hemline or a windy day—rather than explicit imagery.

Visual Trademarks

  • Aesthetic Styling: Structured hairstyles like victory rolls, defined winged eyeliner, and vibrant red lipstick.
  • Retro Fashion: High-waisted shorts, halter-neck dresses, polka dots, pencil skirts, and classic sweetheart necklines.
  • Artistic Mediums: Popularized by master illustrators like Gil Elvgren and Alberto Vargas, alongside photographic icons like Bettie Page.

The Virgin

The virgin archetype (historically linked to the Maiden or the Innocent) is a foundational cultural symbol representing purity, untapped potential, and uncorrupted beginnings. Rooted in ancient mythology, religious traditions, and classic folklore, this archetype personifies a state of untouched wholeness and spiritual or moral clarity. Rather than just a physical state, it signifies psychological independence—being complete within oneself, uninfluenced by external corruption, and possessing a clean slate from which new journeys or transformations can begin.

Core Qualities

  • Inherent Purity: Represents untainted goodness, moral clarity, and an idealistic view of the world.
  • Untapped Potential: Symbolizes a fertile starting point, containing latent talents, ideas, and growth waiting to unfold.
  • Self-Containment: Embodies an inner autonomy, remaining spiritually and emotionally whole and independent of external forces.

Cultural Trademarks

  • Visual Symbolism: Frequently associated with the color white, open landscapes, spring blossoms, water, and unbroken circles.
  • Character Tropes: Often portrayed as the naive protagonist, the incorruptible hero, or the peaceful mediator in a chaotic world.
  • Mythological Roots: Exemplified by independent lunar goddesses like Artemis, or figures of divine grace and devotion like the Virgin Mary.

MODERN FEMALE ARCHETYPES

Modern female archetypes reflect evolving societal roles, cultural shifts, and individual expressions of identity. Below is a list of archetypes that capture common themes in contemporary contexts, drawn from cultural observations, media, and social dynamics. Representations of traits and roles seen today:

The Trailblazer Archetype
  • Description: An ambitious, independent woman defined by entering spaces previously closed to women, challenging institutional barriers, and achieving visible forms of leadership or authority.
  • Example: The first woman to hold a prominent political office, lead a traditionally male profession, or achieve recognition in a field where women have historically been excluded.
  • Cultural Context: Rooted in narratives of women’s liberation and professional advancement, the Trailblazer celebrates the woman who becomes “the first.” Contemporary versions also expose the burden placed on individual women to represent broader social progress through personal achievement.
The Creator Archetype
  • Description: An expressive, imaginative woman who defines herself through making—art, writing, music, design, performance, fashion, or digital content—and treats creativity as an extension of personal identity.
  • Example: The independent artist, singer-songwriter, filmmaker, designer, or online creator who develops a recognizable personal aesthetic and audience.
  • Cultural Context: An old archetype transformed by contemporary ideas of authenticity, personal branding, and creative entrepreneurship. Social media has increasingly collapsed the distinction between creating the work, presenting oneself, and marketing both.
The Caregiver Archetype
  • Description: A nurturing, empathetic woman whose identity centers on protecting, teaching, healing, supporting, or sustaining other people.
  • Example: The nurse caring for patients, teacher investing deeply in students, mother maintaining a household, or community organizer building networks of mutual support.
  • Cultural Context: One of the oldest feminine archetypes, closely connected to motherhood and domesticity but increasingly expanded beyond the family. Contemporary versions attempt to recognize caregiving as valuable social and emotional labor while also questioning the expectation that women should perform it naturally or selflessly.
The Rebel Archetype
  • Description: A defiant, confrontational, or deliberately nonconforming woman who refuses expected standards of behavior, appearance, sexuality, politics, or respectability.
  • Example: The punk musician, outspoken activist, sexually unconventional woman, or public figure who deliberately violates expectations of how women are supposed to behave.
  • Cultural Context: Female rebellion carries particular cultural weight because femininity has historically been associated with obedience, agreeableness, modesty, and restraint. The Rebel can therefore be simultaneously celebrated as liberated and condemned through stereotypes such as the Shrew, Hysteric, Slut, or Shrill Feminist.
The Sage Archetype
  • Description: A knowledgeable, reflective woman whose authority derives from experience, intelligence, insight, or accumulated wisdom rather than beauty, sexuality, or conventional status.
  • Example: The respected professor, writer, elder, mentor, philosopher, therapist, or spiritual teacher whose role is to interpret experience and guide others.
  • Cultural Context: The Sage offers an alternative to cultural traditions that disproportionately value women for youth and physical desirability. She also overlaps with older figures such as the wise woman, healer, crone, and witch—revealing how female knowledge can be represented as either wisdom or threat.
The Hustler Archetype
  • Description: A relentlessly resourceful woman who builds opportunities for herself through work, entrepreneurship, networking, self-promotion, side businesses, or multiple simultaneous pursuits.
  • Example: The woman balancing a full-time job with freelance work, an online business, personal branding, and other income-generating projects.
  • Cultural Context: Closely associated with 21st-century entrepreneurial culture and the rise of the “girlboss.” Initially framed as empowerment through economic independence, the archetype has increasingly been criticized for turning structural inequalities and economic insecurity into individual obligations to work harder and market oneself more effectively.
The Explorer Archetype
  • Description: A curious, independent woman who seeks freedom, novelty, travel, experimentation, and experiences outside conventional expectations of home and stability.
  • Example: The solo traveler, digital nomad, expatriate, van-lifer, or woman who deliberately constructs an unconventional life around experience rather than permanence.
  • Cultural Context: Historically, adventure and wandering were disproportionately coded masculine while women were associated with domestic stability. The contemporary Explorer therefore makes female mobility and independence central to identity, although social media has also transformed exploration into an aesthetic and marketable lifestyle.
The Advocate Archetype
  • Description: A socially engaged woman who uses her voice, labor, visibility, or authority to advance a political, environmental, humanitarian, or social cause.
  • Example: Malala Yousafzai’s advocacy for girls’ education or a community organizer campaigning for change at the local level.
  • Cultural Context: Descends from long traditions of women working in abolition, suffrage, labor, civil rights, peace, environmental, and feminist movements. Digital media has greatly expanded the Advocate’s visibility while also creating tension between sustained activism and the public performance of political identity.
The Balancer Archetype
  • Description: A woman expected to maintain a successful career, intimate relationships, family responsibilities, health, friendships, personal development, and an independent identity without allowing any one role to overwhelm the others.
  • Example: The working mother simultaneously managing professional ambition, parenting, partnership, friendships, fitness, and personal fulfillment.
  • Cultural Context: A particularly contemporary archetype emerging from women’s expanded professional opportunities without an equivalent disappearance of traditional domestic expectations. Often presented as empowerment, “having it all” can also become an impossible standard requiring women to perform successfully in every sphere at once.
The Maverick Archetype
  • Description: An unconventional, self-directed woman who deliberately constructs her own rules rather than merely succeeding within established ones.
  • Example: The designer, entrepreneur, performer, artist, or public figure whose unusual career, appearance, relationships, or creative choices resist easy categorization.
  • Cultural Context: Related to the Rebel but distinguished by motivation: the Rebel defines herself partly through opposition, while the Maverick is defined by autonomy. Contemporary culture celebrates this type as evidence of individuality, although unconventional women are often accepted most readily once their difference becomes successful, fashionable, or commercially valuable.

Negative female stereotypes

Negative female stereotypes often stem from outdated cultural norms, media portrayals, or societal biases, and they can oversimplify or misrepresent women’s diverse identities. Below is a list of common negative stereotypes, presented with an understanding that these are harmful generalizations, not reflective of reality:

General Gender Archetypes

The Hysteric Archetype
  • Description: A woman portrayed as excessively emotional, irrational, unstable, or incapable of responding proportionately to events.
  • Example: The woman whose anger, fear, or distress is dismissed as an emotional outburst rather than treated as a legitimate response.
  • Cultural Context: Descends directly from the long medical and cultural history of “female hysteria,” in which women’s emotional and physical experiences were pathologized. Modern versions often appear in language such as “crazy,” “unstable,” or “overreacting.”
The Gold Digger Archtype
  • Description: A woman presumed to pursue romantic relationships primarily for money, status, gifts, or financial security.
  • Example: The young woman dating a wealthy older man whose affection is automatically assumed to be transactional.
  • Cultural Context: Reflects suspicion toward women’s motives in relationships while also drawing on historical realities in which marriage was one of women’s principal routes to economic security.
The Trophy Wife Archetype
  • Description: A conventionally attractive, often younger woman treated primarily as evidence of her partner’s wealth, masculinity, or social success.
  • Example: The glamorous younger wife accompanying a wealthy businessman whose character is barely developed beyond her beauty.
  • Cultural Context: Turns the woman herself into a status object. Unlike the Gold Digger, which assigns mercenary motives to the woman, the Trophy Wife stereotype emphasizes her value to the partner as a possession or display.
The Mean Girl Archetype
  • Description: A socially powerful woman or girl portrayed as cruel, status-conscious, manipulative, and particularly hostile toward other women.
  • Example: Regina George and the Plastics in Mean Girls.
  • Cultural Context: Became especially prominent in late-20th- and early-21st-century teen culture. While female social aggression certainly exists, the trope can turn competition among women into an assumed feature of female relationships.
  • Description: A woman placed in danger or difficulty primarily so that another character—traditionally a man—can rescue her.
  • Example: The kidnapped princess awaiting rescue in fairy tales, adventure serials, games, and early Hollywood films.
  • Cultural Context: One of Western storytelling’s oldest female archetypes. Her vulnerability supplies the hero with motivation while limiting her own agency within the story.
The Shrew Archetype
  • Description: An outspoken, argumentative, domineering, or difficult woman whose refusal to be agreeable becomes her defining flaw.
  • Example: The “battle-axe” wife who publicly humiliates or commands her husband.
  • Cultural Context: An extremely old stereotype, visible in European literature and folklore for centuries. It historically helped define assertiveness and disobedience as particularly objectionable qualities in women.
The Nagging Wife
  • Description: A wife portrayed as constantly criticizing, correcting, restricting, or making demands of her husband.
  • Example: The sitcom wife complaining about drinking, spending, chores, or her husband’s irresponsible friends.
  • Cultural Context: A domestic descendant of the Shrew. The trope frequently converts unequal household labor or legitimate grievances into evidence that the woman is humorless and controlling.
The Overbearing Mother Archetype
  • Description: A mother portrayed as controlling, intrusive, smothering, or unwilling to allow her children independence.
  • Example: The mother who constantly interferes in her adult child’s career, relationships, or household.
  • Cultural Context: Reflects cultural anxiety about maternal influence becoming excessive, particularly when women exercise authority within the family.
The Sacrificial Mother Archetype
  • Description: A woman whose virtue is measured by how completely she abandons her own ambitions, pleasure, identity, or needs for her children.
  • Example: The mother whose narrative exists almost entirely around suffering and sacrifice for her family.
  • Cultural Context: Emerging from the ideal of motherhood as female selflessness, this archetype can make maternal sacrifice admirable while simultaneously presenting female self-interest as selfish.
The Helpless Housewife Archetype
  • Description: A domestically confined woman portrayed as naïve, dependent, or incapable of functioning independently in the wider world.
  • Example: The wife who cannot manage finances, repairs, employment, or major decisions without her husband.
  • Cultural Context: Particularly associated with idealized mid-century domestic gender roles, although modern media frequently uses the type nostalgically or ironically.
The Bimbo Archetype
  • Description: A conventionally attractive and highly sexualized woman portrayed as unintelligent, naïve, frivolous, or intellectually empty.
  • Example: The beautiful woman who misunderstands obvious information while other characters tolerate her because she is attractive.
  • Cultural Context: Connects conspicuous femininity and sexuality with intellectual inferiority. The stereotype has also been deliberately reclaimed and parodied in contemporary fashion and internet culture.
The Dumb Blonde Archetype
  • Description: A blonde woman whose beauty is presented as inversely related to her intelligence.
  • Example: The glamorous blonde who repeatedly misunderstands simple situations for comic effect.
  • Cultural Context: Popularized through vaudeville, Hollywood comedy, advertising, and blonde jokes. It is closely related to the Bimbo but attaches stupidity specifically to a recognizable beauty type.
The Valley Girl Archetype
  • Description: A young woman portrayed as shallow, consumerist, linguistically unserious, trend-obsessed, and intellectually incurious.
  • Example: The mall-obsessed California teenager speaking in exaggerated “like,” “totally,” and “whatever” slang.
  • Cultural Context: Emerging from Southern California stereotypes in the 1980s, the Valley Girl became shorthand for affluent young female superficiality and helped stigmatize speech patterns associated with young women.
The Vain Beauty Archetype
  • Description: A beautiful woman portrayed as excessively preoccupied with her appearance, desirability, or the attention she receives.
  • Example: The woman constantly checking mirrors, taking photographs of herself, or competing to remain the most attractive person in the room.
  • Cultural Context: Draws on much older stories connecting female beauty with narcissism and moral weakness, from fairy tales to modern influencer stereotypes.
The Shopaholic
  • Description: A woman portrayed as irrationally obsessed with shopping, fashion, luxury goods, or consumption.
  • Example: The woman hiding shopping bags or credit-card bills from her partner.
  • Cultural Context: Grew alongside modern consumer culture and advertising, which simultaneously targeted women as household consumers and mocked them for excessive consumption.
The Materialistic Diva Archetype
  • Description: A demanding, status-conscious woman obsessed with luxury, attention, exclusivity, and getting what she believes she deserves.
  • Example: The celebrity or socialite demanding expensive accommodations and special treatment.
  • Cultural Context: Combines stereotypes about female consumption, vanity, entitlement, and emotional excess. Unlike the Gold Digger, her materialism need not depend upon a romantic partner.
The Gossip Archetype
  • Description: A woman portrayed as compulsively interested in rumors, secrets, and other people’s private lives.
  • Example: The neighbor or coworker who seems to know—and repeat—everyone’s personal business.
  • Cultural Context: Gossip has historically been feminized and trivialized despite functioning across genders as a basic form of social information exchange and informal power.
  • The Catty Rival
    • Description: A woman whose relationship with another woman is defined by jealousy, insults, competition, and attempts at social or romantic sabotage.
    • Example: Two women automatically becoming enemies because they desire the same man, job, status, or recognition.
    • Cultural Context: Reinforces the idea that women naturally compete with one another, particularly for male attention, beauty, or social standing.
  • The Drama Queen
    • Description: A woman portrayed as exaggerating problems, manufacturing crises, or displaying emotion primarily to command attention.
    • Example: A reality-TV personality whose ordinary disagreements become spectacular confrontations.
    • Cultural Context: Turns conspicuous female emotional expression into entertainment while encouraging audiences to interpret strong emotion as inherently manipulative or unserious.
  • The Ice Queen
    • Description: A woman portrayed as emotionally cold, inaccessible, intimidating, or incapable of affection.
    • Example: The beautiful but aloof executive or socialite whose emotional reserve is treated as a character defect.
    • Cultural Context: Reflects contradictory expectations that women should be both competent and emotionally nurturing. Emotional restraint that signifies strength in male characters can signify unnatural coldness in women.
  • The Bitchy Boss
    • Description: A woman in authority portrayed as abrasive, ruthless, controlling, or personally unpleasant.
    • Example: Miranda Priestly in The Devil Wears Prada represents a sophisticated version of the archetype.
    • Cultural Context: Reflects the double bind surrounding female authority: behavior interpreted as decisive or demanding in male leaders may be characterized as hostility when performed by women.
  • The Cold Career Woman
    • Description: An ambitious professional woman portrayed as having sacrificed warmth, romance, motherhood, or femininity for professional success.
    • Example: The successful executive who eventually learns that her career has left her emotionally empty.
    • Cultural Context: Became particularly prominent as women entered professional workplaces in greater numbers. It frames career and family as competing choices for women in ways less commonly applied to men.
  • The Clingy Girlfriend
    • Description: A woman portrayed as excessively dependent on romantic attention, reassurance, communication, or commitment.
    • Example: The girlfriend who constantly calls, texts, checks whereabouts, or interprets time apart as rejection.
    • Cultural Context: Exaggerates attachment and relationship anxiety into a specifically female pathology, often serving as a comic obstacle to male independence.
  • The Jealous Insecure Woman
    • Description: A woman portrayed as consumed by suspicion, envy, comparison, or fear that another woman will replace her.
    • Example: The girlfriend who interprets every attractive woman near her partner as a threat.
    • Cultural Context: Closely related to the Catty Rival but focused on insecurity rather than aggression. It often links female self-worth to beauty and romantic desirability.
  • The Crazy Ex
    • Description: A former girlfriend or wife portrayed as irrationally obsessed, vindictive, intrusive, or emotionally unstable after a relationship ends.
    • Example: The ex who stalks her former partner, sabotages new relationships, or refuses to accept the breakup.
    • Cultural Context: Combines the Hysteric and Clingy Girlfriend stereotypes into a post-relationship archetype. It can trivialize genuine relationship conflict by making female emotional responses evidence of insanity.
  • The Fickle Romantic
    • Description: A woman portrayed as perpetually uncertain about whom she loves or what she wants from relationships.
    • Example: The heroine repeatedly choosing between two romantic partners while seemingly incapable of making a lasting decision.
    • Cultural Context: Draws on older stereotypes of women as emotionally changeable and indecisive, particularly in romantic matters.
  • The Prude
    • Description: A woman portrayed as excessively sexually reserved, repressed, judgmental, or frightened of sexuality.
    • Example: The sexually cautious character mocked by friends for refusing casual sex.
    • Cultural Context: Represents one side of a persistent sexual double bind: women can be stigmatized both for expressing sexuality and for withholding it.
  • The Promiscuous Woman
    • Description: A woman whose sexual activity is treated as evidence of recklessness, low self-worth, immorality, or lack of self-control.
    • Example: A sexually active female character whose number of partners becomes shorthand for her character.
    • Cultural Context: Commonly called the “slut” stereotype, it reflects a longstanding sexual double standard in which comparable behavior can enhance male status while diminishing female status.
  • The Party Girl
    • Description: A woman portrayed as hedonistic, intoxicated, sexually uninhibited, irresponsible, and uninterested in conventional obligations.
    • Example: The perpetually clubbing character whose life consists of drinking, hookups, and avoiding responsibility.
    • Cultural Context: Combines anxieties about female sexuality with anxieties about women rejecting domestic responsibility and respectable behavior.
  • The Irresponsible Party Mom
    • Description: A mother portrayed as selfish or ridiculous because she continues pursuing nightlife, sexuality, youth culture, or personal pleasure.
    • Example: The mother who goes clubbing while other characters condemn her for behaving like someone without children.
    • Cultural Context: Extends the Party Girl stereotype into motherhood, where expectations of female sacrifice make adult pleasure particularly easy to portray as neglect.
  • The Manic Pixie Dream Girl
    • Description: An eccentric, spontaneous, charming woman whose primary narrative function is to awaken a withdrawn or dissatisfied male protagonist to the possibilities of life.
    • Example: Frequently associated with characters such as Sam in Garden State, although individual examples are often more complicated than the trope suggests.
    • Cultural Context: Coined by critic Nathan Rabin in 2007 to describe a recurring cinematic type. The criticism is less that quirky women exist than that their inner lives are subordinated to male character development.
  • The Token Girlfriend
    • Description: A female character included primarily to provide a male protagonist with romance, motivation, validation, or emotional stakes.
    • Example: The hero’s girlfriend who has little independent goal or personality outside their relationship.
    • Cultural Context: Closely related to broader criticism of underwritten female characters whose narrative importance derives almost entirely from their relationship to men.
  • The Incompetent Sidekick
    • Description: A female supporting character portrayed as less capable, knowledgeable, or effective than the male protagonist she accompanies.
    • Example: A supposedly trained female partner who repeatedly needs the male hero to explain situations or rescue her.
    • Cultural Context: Allows stories to include women in traditionally male spaces while preserving male competence and authority as the narrative norm.
  • The Party Pooper
    • Description: A woman portrayed as humorless, cautious, responsible, or restrictive because she objects to reckless behavior.
    • Example: The wife or girlfriend who wants everyone to stop drinking, leave the party, obey the rules, or act responsibly.
    • Cultural Context: Often functions as the counterpart to an irresponsible male protagonist, turning necessary adult labor and risk management into female joylessness.
  • The Bad Woman Driver
    • Description: A woman portrayed as naturally incompetent, timid, distracted, or dangerous behind the wheel.
    • Example: Jokes about women being unable to park, navigate, or control a vehicle.
    • Cultural Context: Emerged alongside women’s increasing mobility and independence in the automobile era. Despite becoming a familiar joke, the stereotype has little relationship to inherent driving ability.

Seduction, Danger, and Female Power

  • The Femme Fatale
    • Description: A sexually compelling woman whose beauty and erotic power conceal danger, deception, or destructive intentions.
    • Example: Phyllis Dietrichson in Double Indemnity.
    • Cultural Context: Particularly associated with film noir but descended from much older traditions of dangerous female seducers. The archetype makes female sexual autonomy simultaneously irresistible and threatening.
  • The Manipulative Vixen
    • Description: A woman portrayed as deliberately using attractiveness, flirtation, or sexual access to control others and achieve her goals.
    • Example: The seductress who obtains secrets, money, favors, or power by manipulating men’s desire.
    • Cultural Context: Closely related to the Femme Fatale but need not be criminal or deadly. It frames sexuality as a covert form of female power and therefore as inherently deceptive.
  • The Scheming Socialite
    • Description: A wealthy or socially prominent woman portrayed as shallow, calculating, status-obsessed, and skilled at manipulating elite social networks.
    • Example: The society woman engineering marriages, alliances, exclusions, or scandals for personal advantage.
    • Cultural Context: Combines distrust of wealth with stereotypes of feminine social manipulation, suggesting that women exercise power indirectly through reputation and relationships.
  • The Manipulative Villainess
    • Description: A female antagonist whose defining weapon is psychological manipulation rather than physical force.
    • Example: The woman who deceives lovers, relatives, or allies into destroying one another while concealing her intentions.
    • Cultural Context: Draws on an old distinction between masculine power as physical and female power as covert, seductive, or duplicitous.
  • The Witchy Villainess
    • Description: A powerful woman whose supernatural knowledge, age, sexuality, or independence makes her dangerous.
    • Example: The evil witch or sorceress who curses younger characters or uses forbidden knowledge for revenge.
    • Cultural Context: Rooted in centuries of folklore connecting unconventional female power with witchcraft, temptation, aging, and social disorder.
  • The Evil Stepmother
    • Description: A non-biological maternal figure portrayed as jealous, cruel, competitive, or hostile toward another woman’s children.
    • Example: Cinderella’s stepmother or the Queen in Snow White.
    • Cultural Context: A major fairy-tale archetype that separates idealized nurturing motherhood from threatening female authority and competition within the family.

Racialized Archetypes

  • The Angry Black Woman
    • Description: A Black woman portrayed as inherently loud, hostile, aggressive, combative, or unreasonable.
    • Example: A Black female character’s assertiveness being interpreted as threatening when comparable behavior from other characters is treated as confidence.
    • Cultural Context: A specifically racialized and gendered stereotype that can delegitimize Black women’s anger, authority, disagreement, and self-advocacy by treating them as evidence of innate aggression.
  • The Mammy
    • Description: A Black woman portrayed as maternal, loyal, selfless, desexualized, and devoted to caring for white families.
    • Example: The domestic servant whose emotional life revolves entirely around the family she serves.
    • Cultural Context: Originating in slavery and reinforced through minstrel culture, advertising, literature, and film, the stereotype romanticized Black women’s coerced domestic labor by portraying service as natural devotion.
  • The Jezebel
    • Description: A Black woman portrayed as inherently seductive, sexually insatiable, promiscuous, and morally suspect.
    • Example: A Black female character whose sexuality is treated as more aggressive or available than that of white female characters.
    • Cultural Context: Developed under slavery and colonial racial ideology and was historically used to rationalize the sexual exploitation of Black women by depicting them as naturally hypersexual.
  • The Black Matriarch
    • Description: A Black mother portrayed as excessively dominant, controlling, unfeminine, and responsible for weakening the men or family around her.
    • Example: The domineering mother blamed for her adult sons’ perceived failures or lack of authority.
    • Cultural Context: Became especially influential in 20th-century American discourse about Black families. It shifted attention from structural inequality toward supposed defects in Black women’s behavior and family authority.
  • The Exotic Woman
    • Description: A racialized or foreign woman treated as mysterious, sensual, exciting, primitive, submissive, or unusually sexually available because of her perceived cultural difference.
    • Example: An Asian, Latina, Middle Eastern, Indigenous, or other racialized character whose ethnicity functions primarily as erotic novelty.
    • Cultural Context: Rooted in colonialism and Orientalism, the trope reduces cultural identity to a fantasy constructed for an outsider’s consumption.
  • The Hypersexualized Teen
    • Description: An adolescent girl portrayed through an adult sexual gaze as unusually seductive, sexually knowing, or responsible for adults’ attraction to her.
    • Example: Media that frames an underage girl as a deliberate temptress rather than recognizing the unequal power relationship between adolescent and adult.
    • Cultural Context: Sometimes misleadingly called the “Lolita” archetype, after Vladimir Nabokov’s novel. That label can reproduce precisely the distortion the novel complicates: treating an exploited child as the seducer rather than examining the adult narrator’s sexualization of her.

Class, Poverty, and Social Stigma

  • The Welfare Queen
    • Description: A poor woman—disproportionately imagined as Black—portrayed as deliberately having children, avoiding employment, or committing fraud in order to live comfortably on public assistance.
    • Example: Political rhetoric describing supposedly irresponsible mothers exploiting welfare programs while taxpayers support them.
    • Cultural Context: Became particularly influential in late-20th-century American politics. It combines stereotypes about race, poverty, motherhood, sexuality, and government dependency and has often been used rhetorically in debates over social welfare.
  • The Hyperfertile Poor Mother
    • Description: A poor or racialized woman portrayed as irresponsibly producing large numbers of children she cannot support.
    • Example: Narratives blaming poverty on supposedly excessive reproduction rather than considering economic or structural conditions.
    • Cultural Context: Has roots in class prejudice, racism, eugenics, colonialism, and population-control rhetoric. Female reproduction becomes evidence of supposed social irresponsibility.
  • The Addicted Mother
    • Description: A mother with substance-use problems reduced entirely to images of neglect, irresponsibility, moral failure, or danger to her children.
    • Example: News or fictional portrayals in which addiction functions as sufficient evidence that a woman is an uncaring mother.
    • Cultural Context: Became particularly visible during American drug panics. Although addiction can obviously cause genuine harm, stereotyped representations often erase poverty, trauma, treatment, social conditions, and individual variation in favor of moral condemnation.
  • The Fallen Woman / Sex Worker
    • Description: A woman engaged in sex work portrayed as degraded, tragic, immoral, disposable, criminal, or incapable of having an identity beyond sexuality.
    • Example: The anonymous prostitute who appears only as a victim, cautionary tale, murder victim, or symbol of urban decay.
    • Cultural Context: The “fallen woman” has a long history in Western art and literature. Modern representations frequently oscillate between moral condemnation and victimization while giving sex workers little interiority or agency.

Age and Social Status

  • The Spinster
    • Description: An unmarried woman, particularly an older woman, portrayed as lonely, bitter, sexually frustrated, eccentric, undesirable, or incomplete.
    • Example: The lonely “cat lady” whose unmarried status itself serves as evidence that something is wrong with her.
    • Cultural Context: Developed in societies where women’s economic and social standing depended heavily upon marriage. It makes heterosexual partnership and motherhood markers of successful female adulthood.
  • The Aging Beauty
    • Description: A woman portrayed as desperate, vain, ridiculous, or dangerous because she fears losing the beauty and sexual desirability associated with youth.
    • Example: The older actress, socialite, queen, or celebrity obsessively competing with younger women.
    • Cultural Context: Reflects the disproportionate cultural association between female value and youth. The archetype frequently turns the ordinary process of aging into a specifically female moral or psychological failure.

running list of ideas

San antonio virgins

  • Virgin de Accordion
  • Basic White Bitch
  • Karen Virgin
  • Virgin de Bingo Hall
  • Virgin de Flea Market
  • Virgin de Goth Bar
  • Virgin de St. Mary’s
  • Virgin de 5 Points
  • Virgin de

Cutting It Out Too Soon

Discovery

I was thinking about what direction my imagery might take after leaving Texas for the Illinois prairie. Corn seemed like the obvious point of departure. At the same time I found myself wanting to loosen up and paint cropped nude selfies on flat panels. I even started wondering whether the two belonged together.

That wasn’t the discovery.


Observation

My paintings have been composed and planned almost completely in Photoshop. By the time I start painting, I’ve already solved every creative problem. The act of painting becomes execution instead of discovery and play. I realized I’d been solving the painting before I ever touched paint.

I’ve been looking for ways to create art that is less precious. Less resolved. Less designed. The obvious thought was that I should try painting looser and faster but having tried that, I began to consider trying to find a way of working that didn’t require making so many irreversible decisions early in the process.


Old Process

The way I have been working turned into a close ended process of executing a finalized idea:

  1. Composing and design in Photoshop
  2. Tracing imagery onto precisely measured pickets
  3. Cutting the image shapes out
  4. Sanding and proming all of the edges
  5. Painting details inside the area defined by the cutouts
  6. Assembling the cutouts into the final piece I had made digitally

The results were very controled and intentional. The pieces were all very precious and precise, but they rarely surprised me.


New Process

I was mulling over how I could leave it more open ended if I didn’t trace the images and cut them out, but rather, building them up organically and loosely and playfully before cutting them out.

  • Begin with a painted rectangle.
  • Let the image emerge.
  • Allow mistakes.
  • Allow ideas to appear while painting.
  • Discover the edge afterward.
  • Cut later.
  • Assemble later still.

Even the assembly will be open ended as some images will need to be cut or replaced. Images I don’t end up using can be saved and introduced as needed into later pieces.

Key realization:

Move irreversible decisions farther down the process.


Precision vs. Predetermination

Precision isn’t the enemy. It just doesn’t need to be the default. It can be one technique I used to give emphasis and contrast as beautifully rendered anchor images. Tracing and precision still has a place. Photographic realism still has a place. What changes is when to use them and how to combine them with more expressive and unplanned discoveries.


Assembly

Even the assembly stage will require me to give up control and compose in response to 1000 happy accidents. Wrangling form on the fly rather than trying to tame it on the computer.

  1. Clamp first.
  2. Look at it.
  3. Rearrange.
  4. Remove.
  5. Add.
  6. Leave it alone.
  7. Return later.
  8. Commit.

The object should negotiate with me instead of obeying me.


Unexpected Discovery

The leftovers that are made, the pieces that are edited out during assembly, aren’t to be wasted. I suspect the pieces I remove during assembly shouldn’t be thrown away. They may become an accidental library I can draw from later. Time will tell whether they become useful, but I’d rather discover that in the studio than decide now that they’re scrap.

I want to give future paintings the opportunity to cannibalize pieces of earlier ones, creating a shared history that will tie them together visually and conceptually. A shared DNA. The body of work literally begins feeding itself.


About the Corn

Corn isn’t the subject. It’s the setting. I’m not interested in becoming “the corn guy.” I’m interested in what the prairie reveals about cultivation, order and the ordinary symbols people build their lives around. Whether corn becomes a recurring image or quietly stays in the background is something I’ll discover by making the work.


About the Nudes

The economy of nude swapping that exists has made the prototypical, oddly cropped arm extended, high angle selfie a part of pop culture. Some level sexuality helps to create a tension between form and meaning. The interest in this subject lies in the strange visual language of anonymous selfie compositions.

Cropping, awkward angles, deliberate omission of identifiable features. Nude images are created and shared as communication rather than art…which of course I want to appropriate and turn into art through a change of context, but how that will be achieved is still unresolved.


Bigger Discovery

This wasn’t really a metatation about corn. Or nudes. It was about finding a way to let the work surprise me again.

Keep digging, WOODCOCK 🪏

CORN NUDES

I’ve been thinking a lot about combining two themes I’ve been exploring: corn and nudes.

Along the way, I’ve been collecting thoughts, phrases, images and ideas about where that combination might lead. This is a live document. It may eventually grow to include more complete ideas for individual pieces, but for now it’s a place to dump all the little nuggets I collect before they fall out of my head and disappear forever.

🌽🚜🌽🚜🌽🚜🌽🚜🌽🚜🌽🚜🌽🚜🌽🚜🌽🚜🌽🚜🌽🚜🌽🚜🌽🚜

  • uncanny orderliness of the Midwest
  • The nude selfie is a body disciplined into an image.
  • The weeds in the ditch are more representative of what this place naturally is than the cornfield.
  • offensively benign.
  • Each becomes this tiny interruption in an otherwise absurdly controlled biological surface.
    • a grain elevator
    • a farmhouse
    • a water tower
    • a turbine
    • an interstate overpass
    • a utility pole
    • an abandoned silo
    • a billboard
    • a church steeple
    • a little copse of trees
    • a drainage ditch
    • a single volunteer plant
    • a deer standing at the edge
    • a highway sign
    • a motel sign
    • a truck stop sign
  • Piekets are rows of corn stencils
    • rows of kernels on top of row of plants
    • the gaps betwen pickets could reveal chaos of weeds.
    • each picket could have a different scale, colors, background color,
  • And corn itself doesn’t have to be the villain.
    • Corn didn’t do anything.
    • We did.
    • Poor stupid adorable corn.
  • CROP
    • top of plant that is cut off (corn)
    • cutting edges of an image (selfies)
    • same origin – crop the plant to get the product (corn), crop a photo to get the product (tits)
  • FIELD
    • manufactured reality
    • straight
    • distant
    • repetitive
    • orthogonal
    • vast
    • hard-edged
    • public
    • industrial
  • NUDE
    • crooked
    • close
    • awkward
    • foreshortened
    • intimate
    • fragmentary
    • soft
    • private
    • LOOK AT THIS BODY.
    • vs
    • LOOK AT WHAT THIS PERSON DECIDED TO SHOW YOU.
    • The missing information becomes as important as the visible information.
      • Face outside frame.
      • One breast.
      • Part of stomach.
      • Shoulder disappearing.
      • Bathroom mirror.
      • Bed sheet.
      • Doorway.
      • Flash reflection.
      • A hand holding clothing aside.
      • The strange distortion produced by a phone held too close.
      • Light blowing out part of the body.
      • Blackness swallowing another.
      • And that wonderful accidental geometry created because the photograph wasn’t composed as Art.
      • It was composed as communication.
  • Vertical seams/pickets could become:
    • corn rows
    • phone-screen divisions
    • agricultural property lines
    • body fragmentation
  • There’s also a vocabulary emerging here.
  • Not necessarily titles. Just words I’d put on your studio wall:
    • CROP
    • FIELD
    • YIELD
      • A field yields.
      • A body yields.
      • A photograph yields an image.
      • An investment yields a return.
      • A person yields control.
    • EXPOSURE
    • CULTIVATED
    • VOLUNTEER
    • SELECTED
    • HYBRID
    • FEED
    • FERTILE
    • DESIRABLE
    • PRODUCT
    • GRADE
    • CHOICE
    • FLESH
    • ACRE
    • BUSHEL
    • BODY
    • PROPERTY
    • BOUNDARY
    • CONTROL
  • looking at things long enough that the familiar becomes strange.
  • an adorable little ear of corn—the most harmless fucking thing imaginable—becomes the smiling mascot sitting on top of an enormous machine for turning land into product.
  • Both the corn and the nude are cultivated images.
  • unruly biological thing
  • The edge where bedroom becomes field could have the same razor-straight quality you noticed along Illinois roads.
    • nude, corn Hard edge
    • weeds invade the nude’s space.
    • the weeds are echoed in the crack between the corn pickets
  • Pin up is commodity, corn is commodity…unnatural, cultivated, manufactured
    • she holds corn, advertises corn, is corn
    • on top of weeds, over lapped, dropped on, displacing
    • Make her beautifully cultivated.
    • Pinup language.
    • Commercial photography.
    • Maybe even some of your Sailor-Jerry vocabulary creeping in.
    • Smooth skin. Lovely breast. Perfect curve.
    • And behind her:
      • ditch
      • collapsed grain elevator
      • rust
      • concrete
      • weeds
      • utility infrastructure
      • scrub trees
      • power lines
      • Corn.
      • Pinup.
      • Silo.
      • Weeds.
      • Angel.
      • Turbine.
      • Breast.
      • Grain elevator.
      • Banner.
      • Farmhouse.
      • Cloud.
      • Utility pole.
      • Heart.
      • Highway sign.
    • Now she’s functioning almost exactly like the perfect corn.
    • She’s the desirable product sitting in front of everything required to manufacture desirability.
  • LANDSCAPE
    • 48 × 36″ vertical
    • A woman’s torso is cropped so aggressively that it’s initially almost abstract.
    • Tiny grain elevator.
    • Tiny wind turbine.
    • Tiny farmhouse.
    • The scale relationship makes absolutely no physical sense.
    • Intimate body / enormous landscape.
    • The thing photographed from twelve inches away and the thing seen from twelve miles away occupy the same plane.
  • WOOD
    • vertical wood strips forming the panel.
    • Some stop.
    • Some extend.
    • Some are slightly misaligned.
    • Corn rows cross them.
    • Body crosses them.
    • Wild vegetation appears in the seams.
    • Maybe certain passages remain bare wood.
    • The object itself begins exhibiting:
      • cultivation / interruption / repair / boundary / fragmentation.
    • toward the less precious painting language without artificially “painting looser.”
  • BREASTS
    • Biological.
    • Sexual.
    • Nutritional.
    • Commercialized.
    • Private.
    • Publicly regulated.
    • Desired.
    • Embarrassing.
    • Motherly.
    • Pornographic.
    • Completely ordinary anatomy.
    • exploitation?! They are sexual images!
      • The woman who sends someone a titty pic knows she’s creating a sexual image.
      • The recipient knows it.
      • The little charge created by that exchange is part of the subject
      • Sanitizing that would actually disrespect the phenomenon
    • interested in
      • sexual agency
      • desirability
      • presentation
      • cropping
      • transaction
      • commodification
      • the construction of an image,
      • rather than simply saying I enjoy looking at naked women, therefore I painted some.
        • Corn doesn’t excuse the nudity.
        • Corn complicates it.
        • And the nudity complicates the corn.
  • That’s the double-good-idea thing
  • avoid art school surrealism, clear environmental activism, ham handed narratives, just superimposing imagery and letting people figure it out. Keep distinct. Crisp distinction. Not blending and melting.
  • Tit pic selfie with an ear of corn in hand instead of phone.

Every grain elevator is painted as though it’s the steeple of a cathedral devoted to industrial agriculture.

CONSTRUCTION

  • Instead of layering, have the different picket cutouts meet with a clean edge like a puzzle
  • pickets can be held with a think panel behind glued and tacked on
  • imagery on panel bleeds through
  • Precision isn’t the problem.
  • Predetermination might be.

🌽🚜🌽🚜🌽🚜🌽🚜🌽🚜🌽🚜🌽🚜🌽🚜🌽🚜🌽🚜🌽🚜🌽🚜🌽🚜

Keep digging, WOODCOCK 🪏

The Name Is a Symptom


what’s in a name?

For over a year I’ve been trying to find the name that can best reflecte my artistic identity as a true reflection of me, my art, and why I make it. I’ve worked under several different names over the years as I’ve grown, my work has evolved, and my life has changed. It has been said that you aren’t just selling your art but yourself, and I have wanted to make sure that the name on my art is as much a part of the art as the imagery, style and materials I use. It all needs to be working toward the same goal. I was looking for a name that would match my identity rather than looking for an identity I want to match it.

I’ve tried dozens. Some clever. Some ridiculous. Some that felt perfect…until they didn’t. During the process, I kept assuming I was searching for a better name and perhaps I was, but it was bigger than that. Turns out I was searching for a better understanding of myself and my motivations and the role I want to fill as a midwest folk trickster and what approach I will be taking as I begin making art that will reflect this new world that I occupy.


Discovery

As I continued to go in circles, wrapping myself a name, trying it on, sitting with it, and eventually growing more uncomfortable with it, I discovered something. Every name I liked six months ago reflected who I used to think I wanted to be. Not who I’m becoming. The trouble was, I wasn’t yet sure who that person was. I think I’m finally beginning to figure that out.


The Pattern

I was stuck believing I wanted people to think:

  • funny
  • irreverent
  • lowbrow
  • approachable

But when I looked at the words I’ve been using to describe my work lately, a different pattern appeared. Now I keep saying things like:

  • grounded
  • weathered
  • industrial
  • prairie
  • agricultural
  • handmade
  • dry
  • ironic without being sarcastic
  • healthy skepticism
  • Midwestern

What I thought was a branding exercise was really an exercise in defining my identity. A name to reflect my purpose.


previous iterations

Moe Profane

As I was hitting my middle 30s, my creative itch had been fermenting for years, building until it finally exploded into my first mature body of work. I had read about the Stuckist movement in the UK and their leader, Billy Childish. His art didn’t resonate with me, but the way his name reflected his motivations and purpose really stuck with me. The recovering Catholic side of me decided to make art under the name Moe Profane which would also match the persona I had already been cultivating in the Louisville, KY hipster/art/music scene. Moe Profane was my id. He said and painted things that I never would have.

Dick Van Der Wurst

It wasn’t long after that I began to grow more and more uncomfortable with the name. It seemed silly. I was older and less angry. I wanted to be lighter and less negative. I looked for a name that would embrace the Texas German heritage and reflect some of the pop culture and humor as well. An annual South Texas event, Wurstfest (sausage festival) inspired wonderful puns (wurst/worst), and “Dick” worked as a not-so-subtle nod toward my still somewhat irreverent iconoclastic worldview.

Mikey Likey

My move to Illinois got me thinking that I needed something a bit more grounded and less silly, but every bit as connected to my work. I gravitated toward the name and eventually embraced “Mikey Likey,” but I believe now that I was too eager to settle the matter and was settling because it was familiar. It is a phrase I have said enough times that my sister actually uses it as a playful nickname for me. It felt poppy and fun and positive. It seemed perfect for a while, but soon I was having doubts. I didn’t want a name that might eventually make me cringe when introducing myself.

It isn’t that I dislike the name. I dislike the assumptions it creates. It sounds playful. Not serious. Young and cute. Not strong and grounded. It isn’t subtle. Just too much of the wrong vibe. Meant to be ironic, it risked just being a silly joke no one got. I feared it might require me to project myself in an inauthentic way in order to meet the expectations it would put in people’s heads. That’s not what I really wanted or needed.


The better question

Eventually I stumbled upon a better question to ask while judging how well a name would work.

Instead of asking:

“Do I like this name?”

I started asking:

“What kind of man do I want people to imagine before they see the paintings?”

That question led me where I needed to go.


Then I heard a name…

As time passed I kept encountering names that would have me asking, “Oh, damn. Why didn’t I think of that before? I wish I had chosen something like that.” Then a name appeared that I thought was perfect. Woodcock. Strong, independent, authentic…I figured if I combined it with the right first name it could have just a hint of old school “TV detective” and “male porn star” in the same way I have wanted names in the past to have a kind of anti-establishment, punk rocker type of vibe. Real enough to not sound invented, but just perfect enough that someone might stop and think, “That name is so spot on, it almost sounds made up” rather than “Oh wow, he made up a funny name.”

I was feeling that it wasn’t so much…

“That’s funny.”

But instead more of…

“That sounds like a guy who has busted a few knuckles.”


New Perspective

I realized I was inadvertently trying to invent a persona when what I actually want is to discover my own…and label it. My art and I really have no need for a persona at all. The best artist name might not be the funniest. Or the cleverest.

When I checked Google to see if there other Otis Woodcocks out there that might give me reason to avoid that name, I found one. But rather than discouraging me, it reassure me. The moment I put this fact to that name, I knew I didn’t want to be ol’ Otis “Woody” Woodcock, but this shared name would embody an attitude my authentic self would be able to comfortably deliver.

It felt like a name that had existed long before I found it.

Keep digging, WOODCOCK 🪏

The Work Behind the Work

This journal is about building a record of my “light bulb” moments. Including the one I had about how to structure and use my blog.

What I’m after

What happens to all the thinking that never makes it into a painting? I take many different journeys conceptually and intellectually and they don’t all have a direct impact on a particular piece of art. I wanted to figure out how to use this blog to capture the moments when they journeys lead to a new understanding and direction. I want to look back and trace where I have been and how I’ve arrived at where I am. Maybe someday, it will interest other people too, but that doesn’t matter.


Where i’m coming from

I’ve never been very interested in explaining my artwork. I always say, “these aren’t editorial cartoons.” They don’t need you to “get” them for me to consider them a success. They come together in a flurry of brainstorming, free associating, and contemplation mixed in with the occasional “splash of color” just to make the composition hold together better. They don’t usually tell a neat little story. They chronicle a intellectual journey I’ve taken. And just as David Burne once said about writing about music being like dancing about architecture, if I try to verbalize about what I make too much, it just kills the magic that might happen when someone else takes a look and recognizes something unique to them.

If a painting needs a page of text to make it interesting, I’ve probably missed something. I’m not illustrating someone’s philosophy and I’m not being overly clever so dwelling on a piece too much after it’s done and snapping it’s picture is enough post mortem for me. What interests me more is documenting everything that happens before the painting exists.

  • Mapping out the rabbit holes.
  • Reexamining the dead end ideas.
  • Exploring the paths I could have taken.
  • Thanking the art gods for decisions that didn’t stick.
  • Cataloging the symbols that keep showing up before I know why.
  • Reliving the writings, conversations, jokes, and minced oaths that eventually become part of the work.

If not for this, most of that would disappear. This is my attempt to keep some of it around. Not because it’s important but because it’s the secret sauce that goes into making something worth painting. And it is a treasure chest to be sorted through for more inspirations and branching ideas in unanticipated directions.


What happened

I realized I don’t want to keep a regularly cadenced journal of everyday things. I want to keep a record of discoveries. Not every path I take leads to changes in how I think. Not every idea deserves an entry. But every once in a while, a light bulb illuminates brightly through the fog my ADHD addled mind. A question gets answered or is replaced by a better question.

Those moments are worth saving, and so, here I am.


What Changed here

I stopped defaulting to thinking I need to document what I do and I realized it would be more useful to me later and more likely to motivate me now if I simply documented how my ideas evolve.

This digging deeper into the dry hole of my process will capture the sparks. The paintings are only one visible part of a much longer process that ignites them.


what to forget

  • Treating this like a traditional blog.
  • Explaining the meaning of every painting.
  • Recording conversations simply because they happened.

what to remember

Documenting the creative process as part of the artwork without becoming an explanation of it. Don’t kill the magic. Add to it.

The mission statement for this collection of thoughts will be:

Focus on the "light bulb" moments that come about after a process of exploration and discovery. 

Anything more is just documenting dumb shit.

Keep digging, WOODCOCK 🪏

Who needs a cartoonist now?

Reading a 1967 “draw cartoons” book by Jack Hamm. In it he says, “Mankind has passed through many ages and stages, and these changes have made some professions and lines of work obsolete. However, it is fairly safe to say we will remain forever in the ‘Picture Age.’ Our accelerated pace of living finds us seizing on pictures which can be grasped in a flash. An, in a world overrun by peril and tragedy, humorous pictures are wanted. the relief-bringing cartoon gives us a all a much needed lift.”

The point here is of course to assure us that learning the cartooning skill will pay off because the need for human generated humorous images will never go away.

Uh huh.

He’s mostly right. We will always need humor, or at least want it as a release. But his implication that cartooning will be the source of this didn’t anticipate all the crazy AI imagery out there. I don’t have any taste for much of it floating around, but despite the downsides, like most technology, there have been some good results. I’m not saying the good outweighs the bad, and I’m not going to stand here and defend AI generated images in the least. I am just going to say that some of that stuff is so bizarre and random and humorous that it has become, in the right hands, an interesting new way to express oneself. Of course the hand of the artist is lost but the mind of the comedian can be seen in the use of interesting and well crafted prompts. Crap prompts will result in crap images, but coming at it with compelling and interesting prompts can be combined with unexpected processing by the computers that result in something completely unexpected. Never mind that to me that some of the most ridiculous, surreal, compellingly odd images AI makes come from its limitations and mistakes. As it gets “smarter” these are happening less and less and that’s a shame. I kind of loved seeing the AI fuck up. Reveling in its failures with a kind of schadenfreude and laughing at how ridiculous it all was. But anyway.

We are far from computers actually being funny at all. But they are already starting to murder the cartoonists. Yet, here I am. A desk jokey designer who put down his pencil years ago, in favor for the mouse that was already in my hand 8 hour per day, illustrating digitally. I have long wanted to focus on drawing again, and actually trying to master the craft of cartooning rather than relying on what I just picked up naturally as a younger person copying Garfield cartoons. As I’m getting started on what I hope is a new morning ritual, I stumble up on the above quote and had to pause and reflect through the lens of today’s AI reality and the clash of technology and human artistry. And thus…I asked AI to generate a cartoon about that quote. LOL. Fuck it. And fuck you. If my using AI in ironic ways to make myself laugh, hastens our doom, then darn. Sooner better than later.

ME: make a classic 1950s style editorial cartoon panel that highlights the irony of this quote in a time when AI can generate any kind of imagery with a few well chosen word prompts and put to rest any need for the human hand.

“Mankind has passed through many ages and stages, and these changes have made some professions and lines of work obsolete. However, it is fairly safe to say we will remain forever in the ‘Picture Age.’ Our accelerated pace of living finds us seizing on pictures which can be grasped in a flash. An, in a world overrun by peril and tragedy, humorous pictures are wanted. the relief-bringing cartoon gives us a all a much needed lift.”

ChatGTP:

Okay. So let’s critique. It’s very literal and not particularly funny. I tried to get it to highlight the irony in hopes it could come up with something there, but it didn’t. The cartoon in the image is pretty weird. The deformities and extra appendages and smiling people exploding aand flying around. The rest is pretty well done which tells me that a more precise prompt with an actual human generated specific humorous idea in mind could be illustrated fairly well and quickly. Leaving the concept still with the human.

I actually feels this is just one more technology that makes what is actually made by the human hand more precious and valuable, not less. AI will be a cheap knock off like so many commercial printing methods. What struck me most was the stack of books on the bottom left. Those are all professions (except cartoonists and illustrators, so far) that have been relegated to the past by technologies predating AI by decades and centuries. What’s two more? I don’t know. How much is too much? I don’t know. All I know is that it’s been happening to all forms of image making, technology making things easier faster and cheaper to make with machines, rather than humans. AI design and illustration is just one more. We may be correct in acting like it is a signal of the end days, or we may just be the next group of dinosaurs on the edge of the evolutionary cliff, and all of our protests will be irrelevant and forgotten the same as all the John Henrys and their sledge hammers.

Keep digging, WOODCOCK 🪏

How I might fit into the midwest art world

Today I heard it expressed that something interesting is happening in the midwest, post industrial, agro-industrial cities like chicago, st louis, indianapolis. For decades, contemporary American art has largely been driven by New York, Los Angeles, and increasingly online/global discourse. Much of it revolves around identity, theory, institutional critique, or highly polished market-friendly objects.

The Midwest seems to be moving in another direction.

That is being seen in What I’m see in Chicago especially, but also St. Louis, Indianapolis, Milwaukee, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh, Detroit, and smaller university cities—is a renewed interest in making work that is:

  • materially grounded!
  • handmade!
  • humorous!
  • philosophically curious!
  • suspicious of certainty!
  • regional without being nostalgic!
  • intellectually ambitious without academic jargon!

A recent Chicago exhibition even framed this as a distinctly *”Midwestern” conceptualism*: artists embracing slowness, studied nonchalance, and resisting the pressure to constantly produce or optimize. The curators described it as a “Midwestern alternative to the demands of artistic production as a rat race.”

An anthropologist at MIT recently proposed the term “paraindustrial.”

Instead of industry disappearing, industry and its ruins now coexist:

  • abandoned grain elevators
  • active rail lines
  • logistics warehouses
  • Amazon fulfillment centers
  • old brick factories
  • data centers
  • soybean fields
  • biotech labs

None of these erased the others.

They all exist simultaneously. The Midwest has become a landscape where every historical layer remains visible.

Things I need to think about and learn about next:

  • the way Chicago Imagists used humor rather than irony.
  • using humor as a philosophical tool rather than just a visual style.
  • how the Imagists believed high culture and low culture were artificial distinctions and could co-exist.
  • what their on going influence and legacy is today.

What I learned already is that my brand of pop art aligns with them more than any other. Rather than being cool, detached, emotionally flat, they focus on handmade, funny, awkward, persona, mystical, psychological. Not just observing culture, but inhabiting it.

Like a joke makes you briefly hold two contradictory ideas at once, that is what my work does. Not making visual jokes though, but rather using humor to destabilize certainty.

I certainly don’t look at their work and find imagery that is similar to mine, but the philosophy is spot on. LOL.

Keep digging, WOODCOCK 🪏

The Best Damn Pet Portraits in All the Land

Pet portraits are always fun. Here are some painting and illustrations I have done to immortalize people’s precious pets. Contact me if you’re interested in me capturing your critter’s likeness for the rest of time or until the acrylic turns to dust.

Keep digging, WOODCOCK 🪏

Just Live a Bit More Simply, Fatty

If things we don’t need but really like are going to be more expensive, tough shit.

Y’all have to know the pressure America has always put on brown people around the world to provide us with this unsustainable standard of living.

I’m not in favor of how Trump is handling this shit nor his motivations in doing so, I’m just saying. We aren’t owed all this relative luxury our country is flooded with and while we may enjoy it, it comes at a cost.

Maybe just consume less, live simple and fucking vote next time.

Photo Credit: https://easy-peasy.ai/ai-image-generator/images/unsustainable-cityscape-environmental-destruction-overdevelopment

Keep digging, WOODCOCK 🪏

The Creation of a Master Piece – How it all comes together.

Here you can see the steps involved in creating a WOODCOCK piece.

  • Harbinger: For the Love of God painting of a 4 legged AI generated fat ugly angel above octopus tentacles holding Lone Star beer cans.

Keep digging, WOODCOCK 🪏